Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Slovakia's Parliament Complicates Bailout Plans

Slovakia, the second poorest of the 17 nations that use the euro, has complicated plans to help Greece and other debt-ravaged countries. The Slovakian parliament was due to be the last to approve the expansion of the eurozone bailout fund. But internal divisions in the ruling coalition caused the government to collapse instead.

  • Subscribe to Europe podcast via:

    close

  • ?

Economy

The country's government also fell with the vote because it included a no-confidence measure.

Europe

The parliament in Malta passed a controversial measure to expand Europe's bailout fund late Monday.

Europe

Slovakia's parliament was due to be the last to approve the expansion of the eurozone bailout fund.

Source: http://www.npr.org/2011/10/11/141246685/slovakia-to-determine-fate-of-greek-bailout-plan?ft=1

mark fuhrman deadspin.com brett f... minka kelly

Are There Truly Free Energy Devices?

Are There Really Free of charge Power Devices?
Post by Linda Hernandez








Issues in later life the non-renewable resources are decreasing on an annual basis. Apart from that, generating power with non-renewable resources pollute the earth. Nowadays, the biggest threat to environment is the gases that can be released by burning these varieties of resources. The key dilemma will be the threat to the ozone membrane. In this scenario, it is critical to

Tesla's Generator

Monday, October 10, 2011

Report: Sprint's Total Equipment Protection Won't Cover iPhones [Sprint]

It looks like Sprint iPhone users will have to buy AppleCare+ like the rest of us if you want a safety net for dropped, submerged, and otherwise demolished handsets. SprintFeed got its hands on a slide saying Sprint's Total Equipment Protection plans won't cover the iPhone. More »


Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/-ehPUQVYzQw/report-sprints-total-equipment-protection-wont-cover-iphones

is there mail on col... miley cyrus lap danc... columbus day 2010

Patriots 30, Jets 21: Thinking of Playoff Glory, Jets Lose to Patriots

Patriots 30, Jets 21

Jets Stagger Against Patriots, Losing 3rd Straight

Elise Amendola/Associated Press

New England Patriots running back BenJarvus Green-Ellis rushed for a career-high 136 yards.

By BEN SHPIGEL
Published: October 9, 2011

FOXBOROUGH, Mass. ? All week, the Jets adhered to one motto: if they could do it once, they could darn sure do it again. They could befuddle Tom Brady, again. They could play mistake-free football, again. They could run the ball with efficiency and conviction, again.

Instead, the Jets spent Sunday at Gillette Stadium failing to duplicate the execution and moxie that propelled them at the site of one of their greatest triumphs. Their free fall continued against the New England Patriots, who buried the Jets, 30-21, to further expose as pretense the Jets? boast to be Super Bowl contenders. Last year, the Jets also recorded their third loss of the season at Gillette. The difference is that came on Dec. 6, in their 12th game.

The only good news for the Jets, that their challenging stretch of three road games came to a merciful halt , might not be good, after all. At MetLife Stadium next Monday, their fans will be welcoming back the Jets as a third-place team, two games behind New England and Buffalo in the A.F.C. East, with a defense that has allowed 98 points in three games and an offense that sputtered and staggered against the especially porous Patriots.

?Obviously, they?re the better team right now,? Coach Rex Ryan said. ?We?ve got to be smarter, we?ve got to play smarter.?

The Patriots entered Sunday having allowed more yards in its first four games than any team in more than 70 years, and yet through three quarters, the Jets had amassed only 147 yards.

?I don?t know the reason why we came out so slow,? quarterback Mark Sanchez said.

On 7 of their first 10 possessions, the Jets failed to record a first down. On the other three, they scored touchdowns, but their futility could not obscure what was another trying day for Sanchez (16 for 26, 166 yards) and the offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer, whose promise to return to a ground-and-pound philosophy achieved improved production (97 yards), but not enough clock-killing drives to slow the Patriots? offense.

Even after drawing to 27-21 with 7 minutes 14 seconds remaining on a 21-yard touchdown pass to Santonio Holmes, the Jets? defense let them down, struggling to contain BenJarvus Green-Ellis. He ran the ball right at the Jets, as he did all day, finishing with a career-high 136 yards to balance the 321 passing yards by Brady.

The Jets pressured Brady, mixing up their pass coverage, the secret to their success last January when they defeated the Patriots in January to advance to the A.F.C. title game. They sacked him four times, but when he stayed upright, he dismantled their secondary, which played without discipline. Penalties on Kyle Wilson, Darrelle Revis, Brodney Pool and Donald Strickland extended New England drives, and Antonio Cromartie was turned around on a touchdown pass to Deion Branch.

Over 60 minutes Sunday, the Jets tried to flout logic and conventional wisdom, reintroducing center Nick Mangold, who returned three weeks after sustaining a high-ankle sprain, and incorporating the rookie Jeremy Kerley, who assumed Derrick Mason?s duties as the third receiver and caught his first touchdown pass.

It was not quite a demolition, but it produced a similar effect on the Jets, who were embarrassed at Oakland, Baltimore and, now, New England.

A decisive moment came on the Patriots? opening possession of the second half, one play after Wes Welker split Revis and Eric Smith for a 73-yard catch. A replay reversed Mike Devito?s recovery of a fumble by Branch at the Jets? 7, and Branch atoned on the next snap by beating Cromartie for a 2-yard touchdown.

In a rivalry tinged by acrimony and rancor, all of the controversies leading up to Sunday?s game were self-inflicted, germinating at Jets headquarters. The workweek began Monday with Ryan, furious with his team?s feeble pass protection, launching into an expletive-laced rant. It evolved into a referendum of locker room etiquette, with Santonio Holmes?s public criticism of the offensive line and quarterback rankling Sanchez.

It reached bizarre proportions Sunday, mere hours before kickoff, when the organization took the extraordinary step of dismissing a Daily News report stating that Holmes, Plaxico Burress and Derrick Mason had met individually with Ryan to express displeasure with the offensive system. The denial seemed intended to deflect pressure on Schottenheimer, who, when asked earlier this week about the sputtering offense, said: ?We?re not panicking. We?re working.?

?If it is, then maybe I got hit in the head,? Ryan said of a possible meeting. ?I don?t remember it.?

He added: ?I never thought I?d be here losing three straight, but that?s where were at. We?ve earned it.?

All that work produced a fruitless first quarter: 31 yards, no first downs. The Jets responded to last Sunday?s demolition in Baltimore by emphasizing fundamentals, streamlining their game plan. They vowed to run the ball, run it some more and, after that, run it again. Another quarter went by without an offensive touchdown, extending their total to seven, before that clock-controlling style took hold. Running behind Brandon Moore and Mangold, Shonn Greene rushed on eight of the Jets? 13 plays, capping a 7:54 drive with a 3-yard plunge.

It was 10-7, Patriots, and the Jets were fortunate to enter halftime trailing by only 3 points: a 91-yard drive stalled at the 2, when Aaron Hernandez muffed a sure touchdown, as Brady?s pass bounced off his hands and into Cromartie?s. The momentum-swinger was a mere mirage. All of the things the Jets hoped to do Sunday, thought they could do, did not happen, and now, for the third straight week, they are left wondering how to fix them.

Log In With Facebook

Log in to see what your friends are sharing on nytimes.com. Privacy Policy What?s This?

What?s Popular Now


Tagesgeld-Konten mit Top-Zinsen
im aktuellen Online-Vergleich!

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/10/sports/football/jets-stagger-against-patriots-dropping-third-straight.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

leslie nielsen bear gall bladder us... spiderman on broadwa...

Sunday, October 9, 2011

Why do environmentalists think green energy is reliable?

We Purchased It And Tried It green power Here's What We Identified Out:
Question by chonzo jock: Why do environmentalists feel green energy is trustworthy?
Did all of them forget that solar panels are very pricey and not expense successful, wind and most green power are unreliable and that dams/hydro cause untold environmental damage to it's surroundings?

Do they also think that Earth is operating out of space to put a few barrels underground?
yes, they have turn out to be much more

Tesla's Generator

News Analysis: G.O.P. Anti-Federalism Aims at Education

News Analysis
By TRIP GABRIEL

Representative Michele Bachmann promises to ?turn out the lights? at the federal Education Department. Gov. Rick Perry calls it unconstitutional. Newt Gingrich, the former House speaker, would allow it to live but only as a drastically shrunken agency that mainly gathers statistics.

Jessie L. Bonner/Associated Press

Tom Luna, Idaho's schools superintendent, says there needs to be accountability for federal education money sent to states.

The latest on the 2012 election, President Obama, Congress and other news from Washington and around the nation. Join the discussion.

Even Mitt Romney, who in 2008 ran for president defending No Child Left Behind, the federal law that vastly expanded Washington?s role in public schools, now says, ?We need to get the federal government out of education.?

For a generation, there has been loose bipartisan agreement in Washington that the federal government has a necessary role to play in the nation?s 13,600 school districts, primarily by using money to compel states to raise standards.

But the field of Republican presidential candidates has promised to unwind this legacy, arguing that education responsibilities should devolve to states and local districts, which will do a better job than Washington.

It can seem like an eon has passed since George W. Bush aspired to be the ?education president.? Mr. Bush?s prized No Child Left Behind law used billions of dollars of federal aid to compel schools to raise student achievement on standardized tests.

President Obama?s own signature education initiative, Race to the Top, similarly used federal money to leverage change that many Republicans had long endorsed ? charter schools and teacher evaluations that tied effectiveness in the classroom to tenure.

But now, the quest to sharply shrink government that all the Republican candidates embrace, driven by the fervor of the Tea Party, has brought a sweeping anti-federalism to the fore on education, as in many other areas.

The question is whether states and local districts, without Washington?s various carrots and sticks, will continue to raise academic standards and give equal opportunity to traditionally ignored student populations.

?People want government money, they want higher standards, they want greater accountability,? said Chester E. Finn Jr., president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a conservative-leaning education policy group, who was an education official in the Reagan administration. ?None of those things in most places comes from local control.?

So far, the candidates have not been specific about what a drastically reduced federal role would look like. Education has not become a major issue, and when candidates do address it, they tend to paint the Education Department with the same broad brush used to criticize Mr. Obama for what they see as government overreach on health care, Wall Street reform and the environment.

Tom Luna, the elected superintendent of schools in Idaho, said Washington?s oversight of education is different from health care or environmental regulations. The Education Department dispenses a large share of its billions of dollars to states and local districts on the condition that they uphold two pillars of national law ? that students who are economically disadvantaged and students who are disabled get extra classroom enrichment.

?If you?re a conservative Republican like I consider myself,? said Mr. Luna, who is also president-elect of the Council of Chief State School Officers, ?there has to be accountability for how those dollars are spent. We can?t send them to schools or states with no accountability.?

The change in Republican perspective is most noticeable with Mr. Romney and Mr. Perry, who earlier in their political careers supported No Child Left Behind. That 2002 law required states to show yearly progress in the number of students who were proficient in English and math, although it allowed states to measure proficiency in their own ways. Mr. Perry participated in a news conference heralding federal officials? approval of the Texas plan for putting the law in place, providing $400 million for the state.

But today he complains of ?unfunded mandates? in federal education laws that require Texas, he says, to spend more to meet the rules than it receives in federal dollars. He was one of four governors who refused to compete in Race to the Top, a grant contest that he called ?a federal takeover of public schools.?

Margaret Spellings, the education secretary in the latter years of the Bush administration, said that before No Child Left Behind, when federal laws had few strings attached, many states showed little progress raising student achievement, especially for poor and minority students. ?We tried that for 40 years,? she said. ?The results were far from stellar.?

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/09/us/politics/gop-anti-federalism-aims-at-education.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

jessica simpson preg... monster mash song rally to restore san...

Saturday, October 8, 2011

Free of charge Energy Gadget To Create Your Individual Electric power Or Not?

Totally free of charge Power Gadget To Make Your Individual Electric power Or Not?
Article by john tesla








Did John Christie invent a no price vitality device that would remedy the world's dependency on oil and permit any person to generate their individual electricity for cost-free of charge? In this report, I will tell you who John Christie is and what he did back in 2001. I will request no matter whether or not his creation did alter the earth and

Tesla's Generator